body{-webkit-animation:-amp-start 8s steps(1,end) 0s 1 normal both;-moz-animation:-amp-start 8s steps(1,end) 0s 1 normal both;-ms-animation:-amp-start 8s steps(1,end) 0s 1 normal both;animation:-amp-start 8s steps(1,end) 0s 1 normal both}@-webkit-keyframes -amp-start{from{visibility:hidden}to{visibility:visible}}@-moz-keyframes -amp-start{from{visibility:hidden}to{visibility:visible}}@-ms-keyframes -amp-start{from{visibility:hidden}to{visibility:visible}}@-o-keyframes -amp-start{from{visibility:hidden}to{visibility:visible}}@keyframes -amp-start{from{visibility:hidden}to{visibility:visible}}body{-webkit-animation:none;-moz-animation:none;-ms-animation:none;animation:none}
JOHANNESBURG –– Oscar Pistorius may appeal a parole review board’s decision to delay his release from prison, where he is serving a sentence for killing his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp, his lawyer said today.
The board today upheld a decision by South Africa’s Minister of Justice Michael Masutha, who intervened in plans for Pistorius’ release to say the law requires the athlete to serve a sixth of his sentence before parole can be considered.
Pistorius was due to be released into house arrest in August after serving ten months of a five-year sentence. His parole hearing was conducted before he had served six months.
“We are considering our position,” Pistorius’ solicitor Brian Webber told Reuters when asked if they would appeal the decision.
The family of the Paralympic gold medalist, whose lower legs were amputated as a baby, said in a statement today that they were “concerned about the legality” of the parole decision and believed Pistorius was being unfairly treated.
“This experience leaves us with the uncomfortable conclusion that the public, political and media hype that was allowed to develop around Oscar’s trial has undermined his right to be treated like any other prisoner,” the statement said.
Pistorius was found guilty in September, 2014, of culpable homicide, the equivalent of manslaughter, after he fired four 9mm shots through a locked toilet door on February 14, 2013, killing model and law graduate Steenkamp.
At a globally televised trial, he argued that he had mistaken Steenkamp for a burglar.
Prosecutors are appealing the verdict, arguing it should be murder because Pistorius must have known that the person behind the door could be killed, regardless who it was. The appeal is due to be heard on November 3.
A panel of five judges will hear the appeal. The judges could either reject the prosecution’s appeal, order a retrial or convict Pistorius of murder themselves, legal experts say.
The Cliff Beach Club has reopened for in-house dining for the first time in three…
Elysium means ‘a place of state or bliss’ and it’s the perfect name for this…
When it comes to wedding planning and décor, Emma Corrie takes the expression, “love is…
Clever ways to use up random items such as vegetables, fruit and leftovers in the…
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Integer at tellus quis diam scelerisque tincidunt…
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Integer at tellus quis diam scelerisque tincidunt…
We use our own and third party cookies to improve your experience and our services, and to analyse the use of our website. If you continue to browse we take that to mean that you accept their use.